<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More R.C. Sproul</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jcconline.net/nates-blog/rc-sproul/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jcconline.net/nates-blog/rc-sproul/</link>
	<description>A Christ-Centered Church in Hudsonville, MI</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 02:17:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://jcconline.net/nates-blog/rc-sproul/#comment-516</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://box534.bluehost.com/~jcconlin/?p=797#comment-516</guid>
		<description>You might be right, Kim.  I&#039;d have to watch it again to survey the context of his quote.  The general context of the session was the question &quot;Who is God?&quot;  It seemed to me that the specific context of the quote was the ways in which our culture/worldviews have eclipsed the knowledge of God with lies and misconceptions.  The main points were that two truths have been the specific recipients of attacks by secular forces - these two truths being that...   1. God exists.  2.  The Bible is a reliable record of His revelation.  And the quote about the most divided period in our history, culturally and ideologically, came in the midst of that context.  In which case, he might have been aiming that quote at those two main truth claims and the fights that have accompanied them.

good thoughts.  I always like hearing another perspective, thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might be right, Kim.  I&#8217;d have to watch it again to survey the context of his quote.  The general context of the session was the question &#8220;Who is God?&#8221;  It seemed to me that the specific context of the quote was the ways in which our culture/worldviews have eclipsed the knowledge of God with lies and misconceptions.  The main points were that two truths have been the specific recipients of attacks by secular forces &#8211; these two truths being that&#8230;   1. God exists.  2.  The Bible is a reliable record of His revelation.  And the quote about the most divided period in our history, culturally and ideologically, came in the midst of that context.  In which case, he might have been aiming that quote at those two main truth claims and the fights that have accompanied them.</p>
<p>good thoughts.  I always like hearing another perspective, thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim VanKlompenberg</title>
		<link>http://jcconline.net/nates-blog/rc-sproul/#comment-513</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim VanKlompenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://box534.bluehost.com/~jcconlin/?p=797#comment-513</guid>
		<description>I see what you are saying. I wonder, though, if he meant that right now we are divided on more, and by that I mean a wider variety, of cultural and ideological issues. What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see what you are saying. I wonder, though, if he meant that right now we are divided on more, and by that I mean a wider variety, of cultural and ideological issues. What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

