Skip to content

Tag Archives: truth

Quoting my preacher

Quoting my preacher

It’s been a long time since I’ve highlighted some quotes from my preacher.  Heck it’s been a long time since I’ve posted on the blog, period!  Been busy with other endeavors, I guess.

Anyway, here’s a few good ones from some recent messages, starting with one that’s super-applicable at Christmas time…

“What if you lived as generously as possible while still meeting the needs of your family?”

And here’s one from the message yesterday entitled “Jesus is the Truth”…

“The religious leaders and Pharisees hated Jesus, but not because they caught him in a lie.  They hated him because he embodied the Truth.”

And here’s one for fun from several months ago…

“If you sit on the fence for too long, both cheeks get sore.”

On Tiger and life

On Tiger and life

“….a now-shattered personal life…”

In a recent piece on ESPN.com, Jason Sobel wrote the preceding words in regards to Tiger Woods.  Unless you were on Jupiter, you might have heard about the scandal that has unfolded in the days following Thanksgiving 2009.  A tabloid reported alleged infidelity on Tiger’s part just before Thanksgiving.  Tiger crashed his SUV early on Friday morning after Thanksgiving in a bizarre one-car accident coming out of his driveway.  The tabloids caught the scent of blood and latched on for dear life, alleging multiple affairs by Tiger with as many as 14 different women over the course of at least 5 years.  Within a few days Tiger acknowledged infidelity on his part, though not in any detail, and just two weeks after he wrecked his SUV he went into total hiding as he announced he was taking an indefinite leave from playing golf (and most likely, from any public appearances for the foreseeable future).

A “now-shattered life” indeed.

I’m never been a Tiger fan.  Of course one might think it’s easy to say that after the events of the past month.  But it’s true nonetheless.  I’ve never liked Tiger’s foul language on the golf course, his tossing of golf clubs, his caddy’s treatment of fans on the course, Tiger’s own attitude toward the fans who are responsible for all of his money, his reticence to sign autographs for those same fans, and so on.

I’d rather follow Vijay Singh, a golfer who gives interviews in which he tells you what he actually thinks instead of what he thinks you want to hear.  Or Tom Watson, a man who has more class in his little finger than most of the guys on the PGA Tour have in their whole being.  Or Y.E. Yang, who showed guts in putting the beatdown on Tiger at the 2009 PGA Championship.  Heck, I’d rather follow Phil Mickelson, whom my wife affectionately refers to as “Gumby” both for his goofy appearance as well as his ability to choke in clutch situations.

I’d rather follow anybody but Tiger.

There’s nothing that would make me happier in terms of my golf fanhood than to see Tiger Woods take a tumble.  And what falls into my fanhood lap but a situation that seems guaranteed to bring down Tiger Woods from his pinnacle of golf dominance.  But somehow I can’t bring myself to celebrate.

I’ve gone through a wide range of thoughts on the Tiger scandal.  In semi-chronological order starting from his SUV accident through my thoughts from just a couple of days ago……..

That’s weird.

Wow.

Why in the world was he leaving his driveway that early in the morning?

That’s crazy.

No, it can’t be true.

It’s just the tabloids doing their thing.

Are you serious?

Oh boy, this can’t be good for Tiger.

He very well may be in deep trouble.

He very well may be in DEEP trouble.

Tiger is hosed.

What a crumb.

Man, do I feel sorry for his wife.

What a jerk and a dope.

How could he have everything he ever needed and get caught up in that?

How could he be dumb enough to get CAUGHT?

What was he THINKING?

Well, he’s gonna get what he deserved.  What a dope.

————————————————————-

That’s a sampling of what has percolated through my mind over the last 3+ weeks.

But in the last several days, more has bubbled to the surface.  A feeling that there may be something deeper here.  There’s more to this story than simply cause and effect.  There’s more to it than crime and punishment, or sin and consequences.  It’s deeper than A + B = C.  There may be more to it than a reckless and unfaithful husband, a shellshocked wife, and a marriage hanging by a thread – though that’s more than enough for the public (and most sportswriters) to be prepared to act as judge, jury, and executioner in the Tiger Woods Trial.

And it was that one short clause in a lengthy article by Jason Sobel on ESPN.com that served as the trigger that brought my latest thoughts to a head…

“…a now-shattered life….”

“…a now-shattered life”?  I don’t think so.  No, here is the ugly, unfettered truth:  Tiger’s life was shattered long before it became public knowledge.

It’s just that we didn’t know about it.

His life was already shattered.  It was already in pieces.  But it was hidden.  It was secret.  It was in the dark.  His broken life was covered up with secrets and hiding places and women and enabling managers (maybe) and accomplices (allegedly) and agents (possibly) and only God (literally) knows what else.

But it was broken nonetheless.  Long before we knew about it, his life was shattered.

And that particular realization brought a whole new set of questions for me.  Questions such as….

~~Wait a minute – how would I like it if MY personal sins were exposed for the public to see?

~~Hmmm, that doesn’t sound like a whole lot of fun.

~~I wonder what’s going on in the Woods’ household right now.  Is his wife in shock?

~~Can Tiger look his wife in the face?

~~Was he addicted to his sins?  Was he, deep down, embarrassed and ashamed of his behavior and secretly hoping that he could find some way out of it?  Did he ever feel the twinge of conscience that accompanies failed choices?

~~Did he want to be loved?

~~Does Tiger want to be helped?

~~Does Tiger need condemnation?  Or does Tiger need Jesus?

And how about this one…

~~What would Jesus say to Tiger? And though I don’t know Tiger, how ought I to react to the news of Tiger’s failings?  And how should I react to the failings of people that I actually DO know?

————————————————————-

I can tell you this.  I’ve never slept with anyone except my own wife, and I don’t have any personal sins that are as flashy or headline-worthy as Tiger’s – but I STILL wouldn’t want to have my personal sins paraded around for public consumption.  I know what’s on my inside.  I don’t want you to see it.  Because apart from Jesus, my inside looks just like Tiger’s — broken, shattered, wounded, and battered.

More R.C. Sproul

More R.C. Sproul

OK, Sunday night during session four of the Truth Project, RC Sproul said (this is paraphrased), “We are living in the most divided time in the history of our country, culturally and ideologically.”

Really?  REALLY???????

Sproul is WAAAAAAAY smarter than I will ever be, and I have learned a lot from the quotes that I have heard from him, but… REALLY?

Maybe he is a better theologian than historian.  To me, 620,000+ deaths in the Civil War constitutes a pretty divided time in our history.  The Civil War was nothing if not cultural and ideological.

Am I way off here?

Whose worldview?

Whose worldview?

We’re working through a curriculum called The Truth Project with our senior high kids this year.  Del Tackett is the virtual facilitator and our own Dave and Amy Barber are our on-site coordinators – they’re doing a great job.

Last night’s session discussed, among other things, two worldviews.  (A “worldview” is simply a way of describing how a person looks at life as they know it, and the parameters by which that person tries to make sense of reality.)

A materialistic worldview sees the universe as a box, and inside the box are three things: matter, energy, and man.  There is nothing outside of the box, and everything in life must be viewed and explained in terms of what is inside the box.  A Christian (or perhaps I should just say “theistic” worldview also sees the universe as a box, with this crucial difference – that there is a God who exists outside of the box, and has chosen to come down into the box at various points in history.  This God is concerned about what happens in the box.

It’s interesting stuff that got me thinking, and as we got into last night’s session dealing with the origin and purpose of philosophy and ethics, a variety of questions came to mind…

~Where do we go to answer the “universal” questions of life?  The answer that most Christians would give (obviously, I think?) is that we seek answers in the Bible.  And yet what interests me about this point is the fact that the Bible was written “in the box” – not outside of the box.  And on top of that, it almost always answers question in terms of particulars – not in terms of universals.  Almost all of the books of the Bible, especially in the New Testament, were addressed to a particular people, in a particular place, at a particular time, and in a particular circumstance!  Dr. Tackett says that we ought to go to God for the answer to these questions – and yet the way God has chosen to speak to us has come THROUGH particular philosophies and particular times and places.

What was the worldview of Jesus?  He grew up in a particular culture, a place, a time, a circumstance.  What impact did his time/place/circumstance have on his worldview?  Would we say he had a Jewish worldview? If so, was that OK?  Or did he need to repent of that worldview in order to grasp a more “godly” worldview?

What was the worldview of a good Jew?  What was the worldview of a true Jew, one who would be saved upon his death?

What was the worldview of a good Gentile proselyte, who would be saved upon his death?

Would Dr. Tackett approve of the modern worldview?  Can the gospel work through the modern worldview?

In referring to post-modernism and its philosophical wake, RC Sproul suggested that this might be the most “anti-intellectual” period in the history of the church.  Really?  REALLY???

Is it possible for the gospel (good news) to work through other worldviews?  Can a Christ-follower also be a Marxist?  Communist?  Socialist? Nazi?  Fascist? Postmodern? Modern?

I’m just asking…….  Discuss.